Weekend Olympic Numbers: Team USA Dynamics

. Saturday, August 16, 2008
  • Agregar a Technorati
  • Agregar a Del.icio.us
  • Agregar a DiggIt!
  • Agregar a Yahoo!
  • Agregar a Google
  • Agregar a Meneame
  • Agregar a Furl
  • Agregar a Reddit
  • Agregar a Magnolia
  • Agregar a Blinklist
  • Agregar a Blogmarks








I've put together the “team dynamics ratings” for Team USA and their opponents through Friday to keep you busy over the weekend (I've described those ratings at length previously).

The ratings are similar to Dean Oliver's four factors so I have added Oliver’s fourth factor, free throw rate (FTM/FGA). I’ll describe more about this as we get closer to the WNBA resuming, but I can say that it helped greatly in correcting a few odd results from WNBA games. Since I’m now using free throw rate, I have also changed my measure of shooting from true shooting percentage to effective field goal percentage. The difference is that effective field goal percentage does not take into account free throw shooting.

I’ve also decided not to use synergy differential (the difference in each team’s offensive efficiency) and just compare each team’s synergy. In other words, I’ve decided to stick to describing each team’s performance rather than explaining the outcome. I’ll describe more about that rationale later as well.

A few interesting points about these numbers:

1. Against Spain, Team USA had the problems that they had in the Diamond Ball tournament – low assisted field goal percentage, a high turnover percentage and a lot of offensive rebounds allowed.

2. Although they are playing excellent defense – take a look at their opponents’ effective field goal percentage -- the Spain game was close at half-time and it looks as though the rebounding continues to be a weakness although they are generally out-rebounding opponents.

3. It’s worth noting that Spain got 30% of the available offensive rebounds…in the Diamond Ball championship, Australia got 33% and lost by 4.

Here are the full numbers through Friday’s match against Spain.

The team dynamics rating is the total of the following: Synergy + FTM/FGA + Oreb% - Tov% (Synergy is simply eFG% + A/FG%). The average team dynamics rating in the WNBA for this year is 106.86.

You can think of this rating as looking at the team’s ability to manage possessions (ball movement, shot selection, extending possessions with offensive rebounds and wasting possessions with turnovers) and their ability to draw fouls and make the opponent pay from the free throw line. Most of this has been explained in more depth in a previous post.

The Numbers










































 TeamAst/FG%eFG%SynergyFTM/FGAOreb%Tov%Team rating
 CZE23.64%41.82%6520%23%33.75%74.56
 USA25.35%55.63%8125.4%37%15.11%128.07





































 TeamAst/FG%eFG%SynergyFTM/FGAOreb%Tov%Team rating
 USA23.46%59.88%8313.60%44%12.47%128.99
 CHN19.05%38.10%5723.8%%24%22.78%82.56





































 TeamAst/FG%eFG%SynergyFTM/FGAOreb%Tov%Team rating
 USA43.94%66.67%11113.6%29%13.48%139.93
 Mali12.50%30.36%4312.50%37%38.36%53.58





































 TeamAst/FG%eFG%SynergyFTM/FGAOreb%Tov%Team rating
 ES13.46%38.46%5228.8%30%30.64%79.86
 USA15.94%60.87%7713%56%24.74%121.31



Comments (3)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I don't think I'm as worried about the defensive rebounding as you are. The offensive rebound numbers are high all around in the Olympics (I haven't tracked enough to know if this is common in international play). The average offensive rebound percentage is 31.7 percent.

Only two teams have been better on the defensive glass than the USA. Unfortunately, those two are Australia and Russia, who have been amazingly dominant on the boards.
At least in men's play, John Hollinger stated that he expected a European player's rebounds to *increase* when he got to the NBA, due to the number of missed shots. If the women's game is the same - a big if - then "European style" ball should focus on increased accuracy and decreased rebounding.

I would expect the numbers to be low, not high in Olympic play. Then again, missed shots might just be a function of the players not knowing each other very well, yielding greater opportunities for rebounds all around. It's hard to tell.
Thanks for the comments, both of you.

I would tend to agree with pt's analysis, but for what it's worth, I have the WNBA's average rebound rate as about 30%, so I suppose the Olympics rate is slightly higher, which is a surprise to me.

I guess the reason it concerns me is that Australia seems to be our toughest competition and the fact that they are able to do so well against us on the offensive boards is reason for concern, especially if Mali is able to do well. In another tight game, if Australia is able to do well on the boards again and keep their turnovers down, it seems like Team USA could be in for a disappointing result...

Post a new comment

Comments by